Mandibular autorotation: a critical virtual parameter in clinical decision-making regarding maxilla-first versus mandible-first sequence.

Large degrees of mandibular autorotation during intermediate splint design are prone to transfer error and decrease accuracy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the amount of mandibular autorotation necessary to design intermediate splints for maxilla- and mandible-first sequences using virtual planning software, to help the clinical decision-making regarding the most adequate sequence for each patient. The influence of specific orthognathic movements (different vertical and sagittal changes at the Le Fort I level, cant correction) and the type of maxillofacial deformity (skeletal Class II, III, anterior open bite) were evaluated to identify those that would require higher levels of autorotation for each sequence. Three-dimensional virtual surgical planning data of 194 patients were reviewed (126 female, 68 male; mean age 26.5 ± 11.0 years; 143 skeletal Class II, 51 skeletal Class III) and subgroup analyses were conducted using the Kruskal-Wallis test and post-hoc pairwise comparisons. As an additional parameter (mandibular autorotation), maxilla-first is indicated for bimaxillary osteotomies with Le Fort I posterior intrusion, anterior open bite, and skeletal Class III, while mandible-first is recommended for Le Fort I global extrusion, especially with maxillary cant correction.

Presentation and short-term evaluation of an all-in-one patient-specific implant for cranial reconstruction: A randomized controlled trial.

Cranial reconstruction after bone graft harvesting remains a challenge. A patient-specific implant (PSI) to guide harvesting and reconstruction was evaluated and compared with the use of a free-hand procedure with calcium phosphate cement (C). Patients were randomized to either the PSI or C group. The outcome was measured clinically and radiographically as the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were ease of application, patient and surgeon satisfaction, and the complication rate. Twenty patients were randomized to the PSI (n=10) and C (n=10) groups. Two PSI patients were switched to the cement group due to a poor fit of the PSI. There was a non-significant trend towards more successful outcomes in the PSI group. Two PSI patients presented palpable screws, and one cement patient had a palpable dimple. Cone beam computed tomography showed a significantly lower median volume discrepancy in the PSI group (P<0.0001). The total surgical manipulation time was significantly higher in the PSI group. At 10 days postoperative, three PSI and two C patients presented with minor postoperative complications. There was no significant difference in patient or surgeon satisfaction. PSIs are a reliable alternative to cement. This PSI is novel as it also serves as a guide for harvesting the bone blocks required for reconstructive purposes.

Long-term quality of life outcomes of maxillomandibular advancement osteotomy in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome.

This study was performed to evaluate the long-term impact of maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) surgery on the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) and quality of life (QoL) in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS). The medical files of 12 OSAS patients who underwent MMA by one surgeon between 1995 and 1999 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients received a clinical assessment, polysomnography, and QoL questionnaires as part of routine care preoperatively (n=12), within 2 years postoperative (n=12), and again in 2016 (n=9). A successful surgical outcome was defined as an AHI decrease of >50% with <20 events/h. Of the 66.7% (8/12) of patients who were initially cured, 66.7% (4/6) remained stable at a median follow-up of 19 years. Only the two patients with the highest AHI showed abnormal Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores. After convalescence, most patients reported stable symptomatic improvement. Aesthetic changes were found acceptable and all but one patient stated that they would undergo the surgery again. It is concluded that MMA is a safe and effective procedure. Ageing and weight gain might counterbalance the positive effects of surgery in the long term. It is therefore suggested that re-evaluation every 5 years should be scheduled, since a spontaneous AHI increase over time does not seem to be reflected by symptomatic changes.

Three-dimensional volumetric changes in the upper airway after maxillomandibular advancement in obstructive sleep apnoea patients and the impact on quality of life.

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a sleep-related breathing disorder, characterized by repetitive airway obstructions, causing disruptive snoring and daytime sleepiness. Maxillomandibular advancement (MMA), which enlarges the upper airway, is a therapeutic surgical approach. However, no study has performed an upper airway sub-region analysis using validated three-dimensional (3D) anatomical and technical limits on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Hence, this prospective, observational trial was performed to evaluate 3D volumetric changes in the upper airway according to validated 3D cephalometric landmarks, before and after MMA, for all patients with a polysomnography diagnosis of OSA (apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) ≥5). The secondary objective was to evaluate the impact of MMA on the AHI and in a subjective manner with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and OSA questionnaire. Eleven consecutive OSA patients were included. A significant volume increase in the oropharynx (P=0.002) and hypopharynx (P=0.02) was observed, in contrast to a non-significant volume reduction in the nasopharynx (P >0.05). The median AHI (P=0.03) and ESS score (P=0.004) decreased significantly as a result of surgery. In conclusion, MMA significantly enlarges the airway volume of the oropharynx and hypopharynx and is associated with improved quality of life.

Serial comprehensive geriatric assessment in elderly head and neck cancer patients undergoing curative radiotherapy identifies evolution of multidimensional health problems and is indicative of quality of life.

Head and neck (H&N) cancer is mainly a cancer of the elderly; however, the implementation of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) to quantify functional age in these patients has not yet been studied. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of screening tools [Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 (VES-13), G8 and the Combined Screening Tool 'VES-13 + (17-G8)' or CST], the feasibility of serial CGA, and correlations with health-related quality of life evolution [HRQOL; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ)-C30 and -HN35] during therapy in hundred patients, aged ≥65 years, with primary H&N cancer undergoing curative radio(chemo)therapy. Respectively 36.8%, 69.0%, 62.1% and 71.3% were defined vulnerable according to VES-13, G8, CST and CGA at week 0, mostly due to presence of severe grade co-morbidities, difficulties in community functioning and nutritional problems. At week 4, significantly more patients were identified vulnerable due to nutritional, functional and emotional deterioration. The CST did not achieve the predefined proportion necessary for validation. Vulnerable patients reported lower function and higher symptom HRQOL scores as compared with fit patients. A comparable deterioration in HRQOL was observed in both groups through therapy. In conclusion, G8 remains the screening tool of choice. Serial CGA identifies the evolution of multidimensional health problems and HRQOL conditions during therapy with potential to guide individualised supportive care.